Randisi & Associates

Pre-Employment Screening Specialists

RANDISI & ASSOCIATES, INC.

410-494-0232
Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
    • Background Investigations
    • Drug & Alcohol Testing
      • Urine Specimen
      • Oral Fluid Testing
    • QuickApp and QuickApp Pro
  • About Us
    • Why Randisi Associates, Inc.?
    • Testimonials
    • Testimonials in Chesapeake Human Resources
    • Privacy Policy
    • Consumers
  • Resources
    • Marijuana in the Workplace
    • Employment Screening & Drug Testing
    • Negligent Referrals?
    • Interview with Larry Wilner
    • Drug Testing Seminars
  • Partners
  • News
    • Background Checks
    • Business Success
    • Drug Testing
    • Personnel Management
    • Employment News
  • Request A Quote
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login
    • CRL Order Form
  • Payment
You are here: Home / Employment / Discover How Peoplemark Counters EEOC Lawsuit – Recovers Fees

Discover How Peoplemark Counters EEOC Lawsuit – Recovers Fees

January 14, 2014 By Randisi Associates

bigstock-Are-You-Prepared-Written-on-Ch-25719191Do you know why Peoplemark successfully countered a lawsuit by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for improper use of criminal conviction records in hiring practices AND recovered attorney and expert fees?

As was with Freeman success story Peoplemark had the documentation to support their counter-claim. Peoplemark was able to provide over 18.000 documents and a copy of their e-database records. This demonstrates how having documented support of your activities can help you win.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the award of $751,942 in fees and costs to an employer that the EEOC accused of having a blanket policy of denying jobs to applicants with criminal records?

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION V. PEOPLEMARK, INC.

 OPINION

 The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“Commission”) filed a complaint against Peoplemark, alleging that Peoplemark had a blanket, companywide policy of denying employment opportunities to persons with felony records and that this companywide policy had a disparate impact on African Americans. As it turned out, the alleged companywide policy did not exist. Eventually, the Commission dismissed its claim through joint motion of the parties. Peoplemark moved for costs and attorney’s and expert fees. The district court awarded Peoplemark fees and costs totaling $751,942.48. This award included attorney’s fees from October 1, 2009, through the end of the litigation, finding that as of October 1 the Commission’s claim was unreasonable to maintain. The award also included all of Peoplemark’s expert fees. The district court’s decision was affirmed.

 FACTS

 Defendant-appellee Peoplemark is a temporary-employment agency with offices in Michigan, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Florida. Peoplemark uses an application form that asks applicants whether they have a felony record. Peoplemark also conducts an independent investigation into the criminal records of all applicants.

In 2005, Sherri Scott, an African American with a felony conviction, submitted an application to Peoplemark’s Grand Rapids office. Peoplemark did not refer Scott for employment. Because of this refusal, Scott filed a charge of discrimination with the Commission. She alleged that Peoplemark denied her application because of her race and felony record.

The Commission launched an investigation in light of Scott’s allegations. As part of the investigation, the Commission also subpoenaed, and Peoplemark provided, more than 18,000 documents.   According to Peoplemark, the documents proved that Peoplemark did not have a companywide policy of rejecting felon applicants because the documents showed that Peoplemark had referred felons to job opportunities.

The Commission eventually identified 286 individual class members. The records provided by Peoplemark to the Commission indicated, however, that some of the class members did not have felony convictions and others who had felony convictions obtained employment through Peoplemark despite their criminal records.

In April 2009, Peoplemark formally informed the Commission for that first time that Peoplemark denied having a companywide policy of rejecting felon applicants.

In July 2009, Peoplemark provided the Commission with a copy of its e- database. The database again indicated that Peoplemark did not have a companywide policy of rejecting all felon applicants.

By the end of August 2009, Peoplemark had produced over 176,000 documents.

Though Peoplemark brought a motion for summary judgment on February 25, 2010, the parties agreed to voluntarily dismiss the case with prejudice on March 24, 2010. The dismissal provided that Peoplemark would be the prevailing party for purposes of determining who was entitled to fees under § 706(k) of Title VII, as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k). The court granted the joint motion and dismissed the action on March 29, 2010.

Peoplemark thereafter moved for attorney’s fees, expert fees, sanctions, and costs and won.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids. No. 1:08-cv-907—Robert J. Jonker, District Judge. Argued: December 6, 2012 Decided and Filed:  October 7, 2013. Before: BOGGS and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; CARR, District Judge.*

 

 

Filed Under: Employment

Testimonials

Video testimonial from Rebecca Yarrison Miller's Minuteman Press Owings … Read More>>

Latest News

  • Pair of Companies in the Trucking Industry Says Positive Marijuana Tests And Federal Regulations Contribute to Driver Shortage
  • Supreme Court Ruling Just Changed the Rules for Cannabis Liability Cases
  • Five Things Not to Do When Giving Gifts to Customers and Employees
  • Random Drug Testing Regulations for Safety-Sensitive Positions Upheld
  • Understanding Adverse Action Steps in the Hiring Process

Afilliate Organizations

Tazworks NAPBS

Request A Quote

How can we Randisi and Associates assist your organization with background checks, drug testing and pre-employment screening?


CLICK HERE to Request a Quote or Consultation

Contact Us

Phone: 410.494.0232
Fax: 410.296.6131

1810 – J York Road PNB # 185
Lutherville, MD 21093

Contact Us


CLICK HERE FOR OUR PRIVACY POLICY

©2023 Randisi & Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Site by SPARKS!

We use cookies to make sure you get the best experience on our website. You can learn more by viewing our Privacy Statement.AcceptPrivacy Policy