Randisi & Associates

Pre-Employment Screening Specialists

RANDISI & ASSOCIATES, INC.

410-494-0232
Contact Us
  • Home
  • Services
    • Background Investigations
    • Drug & Alcohol Testing
      • Urine Specimen
      • Oral Fluid Testing
    • QuickApp and QuickApp Pro
  • About Us
    • Why Randisi Associates, Inc.?
    • Testimonials
    • Testimonials in Chesapeake Human Resources
    • Privacy Policy
    • Consumers
  • Resources
    • Marijuana in the Workplace
    • Employment Screening & Drug Testing
    • Negligent Referrals?
    • Interview with Larry Wilner
    • Drug Testing Seminars
  • Partners
  • News
    • Background Checks
    • Business Success
    • Drug Testing
    • Personnel Management
    • Employment News
  • Request A Quote
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login
    • CRL Order Form
  • Payment
You are here: Home / Background Checks / Freeman wins EEOC lawsuit, again! This time in the US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals

Freeman wins EEOC lawsuit, again! This time in the US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals

April 1, 2015 By Randisi Site Manager

business, people, technology, gesture and teamwork concept - smiOn February 20, 2015 the US 4th Circuit Court of Appeals (covering MD, VA, WA, NC & SC) found in favor of Freeman who was defending against an EEOC lawsuit.  In the case of EEOC v. Freeman the court considered a class action lawsuit pursued by the EEOC challenging the employer’s use of certain background checks.

In an earlier post, we highlighted, in detail, the reasons why Freeman won. While everyone else focused on the fact that the EEOC’s expert testimony was thrown out due to incompetence, we wanted to focus on the things that Freeman did right in the hiring process.

It was interesting that in the ruling, the Circuit Court also listed many of the things that Freeman did correctly. The items as listed in the opinion are mentioned below and should serve as a guide for how to properly conduct background investigation checks.

Some highlights of things Freeman did correctly:

  •  There were different packages for different jobs. This showed they considered the job’s responsibilities and unacceptable behavior that was related directly to the job’s responsibilities.
  •  Criteria were identified and documented that would result in a dismissal for future consideration.
  •  The Fair Credit Reporting Act requirements of giving a conspicuous written disclosure and obtaining authorization were followed to the letter.
  •  Making materially false statements led to automatic disqualification.
  •  Applicants were given a reasonable amount of time to address outstanding arrest warrants.
  •  Logs documenting the decision-making process were provided for hundreds of applicants.

Organizations should lean heavily on their consumer reporting agency to help them develop these criteria and enable an audit trail.

EXCERPTS FROM THE OPINION

“In 2001, the company commenced background checks of job applicants’ credit and criminal justice histories. Criminal background checks were required for all applicants, and credit history checks for “credit sensitive” positions involving money handling or access to sensitive financial information. Freeman’s credit and criminal background check policies excluded applicants whose histories revealed certain prohibited criteria. If an applicant’s history included one of the listed criteria, like a conviction for a crime of violence, the applicant was not hired.” (Page 3 of the opinion)

“Freeman required a form authorizing a background search to be completed with each job application, which, according to a company handbook, Freeman thought would “deter individuals with negative information from applying.” However, the checks were not conducted until after a conditional offer of employment had been made. It appears most criteria, as well as making false statements on the job application, led to automatic disqualification. But, Freeman usually gave applicants a reasonable amount of time to resolve outstanding arrest warrants before rescinding an offer. (Page 4 of the opinion)

“Freeman provided the EEOC with complete background check logs for hundreds,” (Page 7 of the opinion)

 

 

Filed Under: Background Checks

Testimonials

Video testimonial from Rebecca Yarrison Miller's Minuteman Press Owings … Read More>>

Latest News

  • Pair of Companies in the Trucking Industry Says Positive Marijuana Tests And Federal Regulations Contribute to Driver Shortage
  • Supreme Court Ruling Just Changed the Rules for Cannabis Liability Cases
  • Five Things Not to Do When Giving Gifts to Customers and Employees
  • Random Drug Testing Regulations for Safety-Sensitive Positions Upheld
  • Understanding Adverse Action Steps in the Hiring Process

Afilliate Organizations

Tazworks NAPBS

Request A Quote

How can we Randisi and Associates assist your organization with background checks, drug testing and pre-employment screening?


CLICK HERE to Request a Quote or Consultation

Contact Us

Phone: 410.494.0232
Fax: 410.296.6131

1810 – J York Road PNB # 185
Lutherville, MD 21093

Contact Us


CLICK HERE FOR OUR PRIVACY POLICY

©2023 Randisi & Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Site by SPARKS!

We use cookies to make sure you get the best experience on our website. You can learn more by viewing our Privacy Statement.AcceptPrivacy Policy